Got a Tip?
tips at gothamist
About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung Publisher: Jake Dobkin

About Us & Advertising | Archives | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Favorites
Newsmap
Contribute

Latest tip:

im voting for obama today! [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

May 5, 2005

Freedom Tower Design To Be Scrapped

Just about a year and a half after a final design had been revealed, Governor Pataki, Mayor Bloomberg and even developer Larry Silverstein have agreed Freedom Tower needs a design to address safety and security concerns. The past week had been filled with the NYPD's very public unhappiness with the current design and its "unsafeness", citing things like the building being too close to the street. This could delay construction for at least another year - and construction is already way off track. It's unclear what the political ramifications will be, but there's been a bit of hoo-ha-ing already, with Assembly Leader Sheldon Silver criticized Pataki and Bloomberg last week for the floundering development and Senator Schumer commending them yesterday for making this decision.

There's no word on the next steps for the design process, but NY Times noted that architectural odd couple Daniel Libeskind and David Childs weren't even present at yesterday's meeting. What Gothamist found fascinating was that Governor Pataki said, "I have no doubt that [tower architect] David Childs will come up with yet another magnificent design that will once again inspire the nation and serve as a fitting tribute to freedom." Just David Childs, eh? Gothamist admits to being a little relieved, because the current Freedom Tower design, as some others have noted more eloquently, was terrible. But if security issues will rule the next round of designs, who knows what will be possible? Other wildcards: How will this affect the development of everything else, from the memorial to cultural institutions to the amazing Santiago Calvatrava-designed PATH station?

87

Email This Entry







Advertisement: Gothamist Continues Below!

Comments (6)

"..citing things like the building being too close to the street."

So every building thats tall has to be built with a huge buffer zone away from the street??

The NYPD's Demands are unreasonable. Not even new buildings in D.C. are build that far away from the street (Over 100 feet they requested). Even if it is a tower.

What about the Citigroup Center, Empire State, the new Bank of America Tower, NY Times Tower?

 

Well, I think the idea is that now whatever will be at the WTC is an uber-symbol of America's enduring freedom and capitalism... it's been targetted twice, so it's possible it's ripe for a third time.

 

How about this design for the new WTC?

 

Calatrava's entrance to the PATH station might be nice to look at, but the station itself is a mess--the whole thing leaks, the concrete was cracked all over the place within a few weeks of the re-opening, and the "art" on the concourse (where the turnstyles are) is unbelievably hideous.

Here's to hoping that the redesign of the rest of the site is not as half-assed.

 

Uh, Brian...it hasn't been built yet.

The leaky, cracked thing is called a "temporary" PATH station.

Calatrava's design looks very cool, but I hope it is not susceptible to the sort of thing that happened to the new terminal at CDG last year.

 

It's a shame that we have come to this. Can't build a tall tower anymore. Can't build near a street. Can't do anything that symbolizes the greatness that was AMERICA. Guess we aren't that great anymore. If 10 people can decide the future of the United States it seems that we have officialy lost the War on Terror. It's too bad.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.

Site Meter