<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Safer Sex in the Dark</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php</link>
<description>All comments for Safer Sex in the Dark</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 arts_jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:33:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jencarlson@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jencarlson@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Nylund</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php#comment-45016</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php#comment-45016</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:51:08 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I got a girl pregnant during the blackout.  If only they had these back then.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>S.D.</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php#comment-45004</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php#comment-45004</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:58:22 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm, I wonder if anyone in the Department of Health ever saw Skin Deep? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ladie's man</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php#comment-45001</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php#comment-45001</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:48:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Certain kinds of Trojan condom wrappers have a bright white strip on the side you tear open. Very good design, because it&apos;s easy to see in a dimly-lit setting. With other condoms, you have to fumble around to see which side you rip open.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ryan Scott</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php#comment-44986</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php#comment-44986</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:44:23 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Funny thing about most glow in the dark products, they need exposure to an intense light for some time before they will glow. How will people know to hold these up to the light before a blackout? If it glowed in another fashion, you would have to worry about radioactivity, like when they used to put cesium I think in watch faces to allow them to glow in the dark. Then people started getting cancer on their arms..why would you want to risk genital cancer?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Rose</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php#comment-44985</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/03/14/safer_sex_in_the_dark.php#comment-44985</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:39:57 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm.  What else would make this easier if it glowed in the dark too?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>