<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Paying for Your CO Detector</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php</link>
<description>All comments for Paying for Your CO Detector</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Alison</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38899</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38899</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:11:45 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Huh.  I hadn&apos;t thought about not taking the CO detector with us. We bought our own new CO and smoke (not a combo though) dectectors before the law went into effect.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>James</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38892</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38892</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:04:27 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;If you live on a high floor, can you still get Carbon monoxide in your apartment?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>honey2</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38882</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38882</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:54:21 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;newer buildings ae more prone to co problems b/c they are more airtight and so if there is a co source, it has no opportunity to dissipate like it would in a  drafty house with old, ill-fitting, energy- inefficient windows.  i&apos;d rather be cold than dead, so i really appreciate my drafty windows!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>BytchInNY</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38853</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38853</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:17:43 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;hmmm the mgmt compay for where i live has not mentioned this yet and they are usually very on top of things.  i&apos;ll have to give them a call and see if they&apos;re planning to install CO detectors.  thanks for the heads up :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>LarimdaME</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38850</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38850</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:55:22 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The best is when my friend&apos;s building *cough cough* got a batch of detectors that were 1 month away from expiring. And, if I read the law correctly, tenants are responsible for subsequent replacement. However, to be fair, the management company did replace the detector free of charge for my friend when it started chirping ... endlessly ... much like that Friends episode. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sjm</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38845</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38845</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:20:41 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The law applies only to buildings in proximity to a source of carbon monoxide, or which have a fossil fuel burning appliance like a boiler. (This includes most apartment buildings.) If your building has electric heat, it may be exempt, although some electrically-heated buildings have fuel-burning water heaters and will still need detectors. Even if you own your own home, the law still requires a detector, but it would be difficult for the City to inspect to check compliance. Also, even if your building doesn&apos;t have a boiler, if you live above a parking garage, your landlord is also required to provide a CO detector. In general, if the device is faulty, the owner must replace it, but the tenant has a responsibility to maintain it. This includes replacing the batteries.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>S.D.</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38838</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38838</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:12:35 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;A newer house I went to (built in 1997) had CO Detectors built in each bedroom, the living room and Dining room.

Don&apos;t know if this is a new trend or not...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Erin</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38828</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38828</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:54:30 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I live in an older building; when the super installed my CO detector, he said that, given the size and location of my apartment, there probably isn&apos;t too much of a risk. But I guess it can&apos;t hurt to be prepared. (And at least this thing isn&apos;t as hyperactive as the smoke detector I had to replace, which went off whenever I turned the oven on.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>james</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38826</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38826</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:35:53 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;do modern buildings (built in the last 10 years) have a risk for carbon monoxide poisoning?  We have central air/heat...i think it&apos;s electric.  I own my condo, so no one is requiring me to get a detector.  But, I will of course if there is a risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Matt</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38821</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38821</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:10:58 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Since we pay for them, can we take them with us when we leave the apartment?  I plan to.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Johnie</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38818</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/01/04/paying_for_your_co_detector.php#comment-38818</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 11:32:43 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;My management company is doing the same thing.  We have a charge of $25 on our rent bill this month.  Called them up and he referred us to the new law and the lease agreement.  He also said we have the entire year to pay it off...so I&apos;ll probably leave it to near the end of the lease..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>