After many years of courtroom dramas and televised trials, Gothamist would think that defense attorneys tactics would never seem that surprising. But, lo and behold, in the case of an
April 2003 killing of a bouncer, we admit we're impressed and disgusted by the moxie of the defense. One evening, soon after the Mayor's smoking ban, two smoking brothers were hauled outside of East Village club Guernica by a bouncer. In the scuffle, the bouncer, Dana Blake, was both stabbed and incapacitated, later dying, making Blake the first casualty of the smoking ban. Now, over a year later during the trial, the defense attorney for Isais Umali, friend of the brothers, says
Umali's actions were heroic because the bouncer was strangling one of his friends. Oh, and Umali is a skilled martial arts (kali, which is Philippine knife fighting), and it turns out that Blake died when Umali used one of his knife moves ("a thrust, twist, and a pull"). Prosecutors say that the incident between Blake and Umali's friend was an "every day incident" that dind't warrant his "special kali move." Prosecutors also have Umali's kali master testifying against him; Umali fled to the friend's house after the incident (the friend also threw Umali's bloody clothes away, and now is testifying against him in a deal with the DA's office). Umali's defense attorneys point out that Blake was 365 pounds and 6'6", while Umali is 140 pounds and 5'7", and that killing Blake was not part of the plan. Gothamist cannot buy this "heroic act" defence, because, seriously, who stabs someone unless they really really want to hurt them? One additional fact the
Daily News pointed out that Gothamist thought was interesting: Chan is the son of a Chinatown gang leader.