
Here we go again: The MTA says fares will go up and service will get cut back. The Daily News talks to some New Yorkers, some of whom understand that the MTA has to do what it needs to do while others are angry. Gothamist feels the same way: We love the subway and bus system that helps us get around, but, really, MTA, you do know how to put us through the wringer. Not that we'd want to be in their shoes, figuring out the mess that this their budget. The Times explains how the MTA's debt went out of control, being a combination of lack of state funding and the way the MTA borrowed its money. The MTA says there won't be another fare increase until 2007, but we'll see if that's true once 2005 rolls around. The Straphanger's Gene Russianoff says, "If there is a fare increase, it has a name. It will be the George E. Pataki fare increase." Governor Pataki, though, is probably on cloud nine, as the Bush administration agreed to give the city $2 billion for the $6 billion project of creating a rail link between lower Manhattan and JFK.
Gothamist thought the Daily News' breakdown of what's happening with fare increases and service cutbacks was excellent - here it is below:
SUBWAYS & BUSESWHAT'S GOING UP
30-Day Unlimited-Ride MetroCard .............. $70 to $76
7-Day Unlimited-Ride MetroCard ................ $21 to $24
Express Bus Fare .......................................... $4 to $6WHAT STAYS THE SAME
Base bus and subway fare ...................................... $2
Bonus MetroCard ............................. $10 for six trips
1-Day Unlimited MetroCard ..................................... $7COMMUTER RAILS
WHAT'S GOING UP
LIRR and Metro-North fares .................... an average 5%BRIDGES & TUNNELS
WHAT'S GOING UP
Cash tolls at major crossings like the Triborough Bridge .......................... $4 to $4.50
Minor crossings like Henry Hudson Bridge ... $2 to $2.25
(E-ZPass users get a 50-cent discount)
Verrazano Bridge cash tolls ................ $8 to $9
(toll paid one way only; E-ZPass users get a $1 discount)
New monthly E-ZPass account fee .......................... $1CUTBACKS
- Close 49 full-time token booths and all 115 part-time booths.
- Add as much as three minutes between scheduled bus arrivals on some routes with available seats during off-peak times.
- Shorten the G line to make Court Square its last stop to the north.
- Eliminate conductor positions on the G and L lines.
Gothamist on this latest round of fare hikes.





The State or the Feds should audit the MTA's books every year. This entire thing stinks. I'm sure they have a few million lying around that they don't know about or they don't want us to know about.
I agree - what the hell is going on? Tien and I were just discussing the Second Avenue Subway - do they have the money for it? Should they work on current, existing service first?
BULLSHIT! There is obviously serious mismanagement going on here. Fares go up, but service is as bad as ever. If anything, raising fares will discourage mass transit use.
Someone seriously needs to audit those bastards.
I understand the need to build the 2nd Ave subway, LIRR to GCT, etc, but the last thing we need is lower quality service for more money!! Pataki needs to restore State funding to the operating budget.
what's with the $6 30-day card increase? they're keeping the tourist-oriented daily-unlimited card at $7 but they're stiffing the obvious new yorkers with 30 day cards? fuck you, MTA. fuck you very much.
Well, I guess we all should bend over... it's time for the MTA to screw us again.
I agree, someone should audit their books and see what the hell is going on. There will be a series of public hearings on the fare increase/service cut-backs. But I have a feeling that the MTA board has already made up their mind and the hearings are for show only.
k - i was reading yesterday that the reason was that the 30 day acutally went up the least last time. and after the fare went from $1.50 to $2, more people went to the 30 day. their target per ride is $1.30, but right now, with everyone buying the 3 - day, it's at $1.26.
I could be wrong, but isn't there already a rail link from Lower Manhattan to JFK? I think it goes by the mysterious name of "A train."
Also, in reading the article, I don't know where they get the idea that providing a "better" rail link to lower Manhattan will somehow attract tourists. I can just hear the folks in Ohio reading this and saying, "Goodness me, I need to make a trip to NYC to see that fabulous new railroad thingy that takes you from the airport straight to lower Manhattan." Because Americans LOVE rail travel.
Man...these fare hikes are killing me. I love how every time they do it they say...the next hikes won't be til 2005. I believe that as much as I believe in the tooth fairy. And the additional $1.00 charge per month on EZ Pass really ticks me off. I have a car I use mostly on trips home to see my family...I don't commute every day...but EZ Pass is the easiest way to pay tolls. Keeping it with that a $1.00 a month fee is going to be harder to justify. Oy!
screw this.
Frankly we only have ourselves to blame, we never vote in worthy people who WONT FUCK US OVER. We don't make our collective voices heard through our votes or through ANYTHING ELSE. So we need to either get really organized or we all need to shut up and take the fare-hike in silence.
They have been audited up the fucking waz for fuck's sake.
The problem is no one for some reason in the city or state courts wants to do anything about it. I mean it, this shit happens with everything. Enron, MTA, whatever. The press will write a few articles and then the government won't do a fucking thing because they don't give a SHIT about us. They're happy in their worlds of power and money and they continue the lifestyle of the Fucked and Stupid.
Christ I hate that.
Guiliani was a mobbed-up pussy, so is Pataki and so is Bloomberg. The whole damn system needs to change.
The courts, the city and state government, it's all in cahoots to fuck us. Otherwise many mroe people would be arrested and jailed and something would fucking change.
Frankly we only have ourselves to blame, we never vote in worthy people who WONT FUCK US OVER. We don't make our collective voices heard through our votes or through ANYTHING ELSE. So we need to either get really organized or we all need to shut up and take the fare-hike in silence.
They have been audited up the fucking waz for fuck's sake.
The problem is no one for some reason in the city or state courts wants to do anything about it. I mean it, this shit happens with everything. Enron, MTA, whatever. The press will write a few articles and then the government won't do a fucking thing because they don't give a SHIT about us. They're happy in their worlds of power and money and they continue the lifestyle of the Fucked and Stupid.
Christ I hate that.
Guiliani was a mobbed-up pussy, so is Pataki and so is Bloomberg. The whole damn system needs to change.
The courts, the city and state government, it's all in cahoots to fuck us. Otherwise many mroe people would be arrested and jailed and something would fucking change.
Frankly we only have ourselves to blame, we never vote in worthy people who WONT FUCK US OVER. We don't make our collective voices heard through our votes or through ANYTHING ELSE. So we need to either get really organized or we all need to shut up and take the fare-hike in silence.
They have been audited up the fucking waz for fuck's sake.
The problem is no one for some reason in the city or state courts wants to do anything about it. I mean it, this shit happens with everything. Enron, MTA, whatever. The press will write a few articles and then the government won't do a fucking thing because they don't give a SHIT about us. They're happy in their worlds of power and money and they continue the lifestyle of the Fucked and Stupid.
Christ I hate that.
Guiliani was a mobbed-up pussy, so is Pataki and so is Bloomberg. The whole damn system needs to change.
The courts, the city and state government, it's all in cahoots to fuck us. Otherwise many mroe people would be arrested and jailed and something would fucking change.
i wonder which company will get the $2bn contract to build the rail link. no doubt a major Pataki campaign contributor. meanwhile you still can't get to LGA by train.
The entry failed to mention that MTA also wants to tack on $.50 to bridge tolls. Please explain to me why it costs me $8 round-trip (soon to be $9) to go from Queens to the Bronx, but it's free to go from Brooklyn to Manhattan? Shouldn't we have a toll system to ENCOURAGE people to stay out of the busiest parts of town? I wish they'd add a toll to the lower manhattan bridges and leave the outerborough tolls alone.
i mean, come on. staten island is just not worth $8.
I don't whine without also taking action. I plan on doing something about it. I Plan on jumping the turnstiles once or twice a week to take back the higher fare they charge me.
Plus I'm no longer taking the LIRR.
I go to work/school from Rosedale to NYC on the LIRR ...6.75 each way peak twice a day 5 days a week. Its overpriced as it is since the last hike last year, and now they want to raise it??? grr
"Tired of whiners" is right; this is a real-world example of deliberate Republican economics. Republicans hate subsidized services, therefore the Subway fares rise when government-provided funds are starved. It's simple economics. Don't like fare increases? Stop electing Republicans, dammit.
what happened to all the money they were hiding last year on that second set of books? and why is that not being mentioned in any of these stories about the rate hikes?
Good point Jenny! I was going to bring that up. Wasn't there a discovery last year that the MTA faked their financial crises in order to push the rate hike?
The idea that the MTA needs to and should be expected to break even is absurd. The fact is the whole fabric of NYC society would fall apart if the MTA didn't run pretty much as is, whatever the cost.
Remember this:
The threat to cut service is ALWAYS phase 1 of the PR roll-out. They say they're going to remove x percent of service because of y debt, the press goes with it (as does Straphangers) and the fare hike goes in, with some service reduction "SAVED".
It's stupid because their supposed negotiation is pure myth. Who is exactly negotiating with who? It's decision by total fiat, masked as something more democratic. And it's really irritating that the press (NYT icluded) play along with the act.
The idea that the MTA needs to and should be expected to break even is absurd. The fact is the whole fabric of NYC society would fall apart if the MTA didn't run pretty much as is, whatever the cost.
Remember this:
The threat to cut service is ALWAYS phase 1 of the PR roll-out. They say they're going to remove x percent of service because of y debt, the press goes with it (as does Straphangers) and the fare hike goes in, with some service reduction "SAVED".
It's stupid because their supposed negotiation is pure myth. Who is exactly negotiating with who? It's decision by total fiat, masked as something more democratic. And it's really irritating that the press (NYT icluded) play along with the act.
How's having a forum where people can present ideas for saving(using honest means) on transit fares? As an example: share unlimited cards with family members. Any other ideas?
I'm so sick of all the whining. $76! For a whole month! That's $17.50 a week! For God's sake, a trip to the movies for 2 costs more than that.
Quit your whining. If you lived in DC or Chicago or San Francisco, or any number of cities worldwide, you'd pay for distance traveled. And for most New Yorkers, that would mean a much bigger chunk of change. Count your blessings and shut the hell up.
No Ara, you shut the hell up. There are no "blessings"; we are paying more of our way as city residents than anyone in the region, especially compared with auto-owners.
In discussing subway and bus service, the CTA in Chicago is not distance-travelled within the city, just like NYC is not (both offer all-you-can-ride passes.) The other examples you site, DC & SF, are regional services by design and have the distance-travelled structure because of the high percentage of stations outside the main city itself. Even then, BART is single fare for SF MUNI monthly pass holders within the city. That is what discussion of the MTA in NYC is about: service *within* a city, and what the residents of that city should pay to get around it. You are confusing that with the cost of bringing suburbanites to their cubicles. Not the same.
NYC users get screwed by LIRR/MN welfare queens. Why not just build individual pneumatic tubes for the travelling convenience of businesspeople and suburbanites and get it over with.
I am pissed. It's the principle. I want spend my money my own way, not what the MTA way. I want to piss into my own pot, not the MTA's pot.
Yessss...We should have a piss on demonstration, where we piss on everything about the MTA we do not like!!!!!!!
Tired of whining should have done something four years ago. That's when the state government passed an MTA capital plan that borrowed billions so the state could divert money to more important interests elsewhere. And it passed a hugh pension enhancement for public employees with seniority.
As a result, by 2007 debts run up by, and pension paid to, those who are cashing in and moving out will equal 50 percent of farebox revenue. That's right 1/2 of the fares you pay will be sucked right into the past. That's under current rules. Meanwhile, the state legislature passed a bill this January to allow TA workers to retire with guaranteed, inflation-indexed pensions after 20 years work at age 50, rather than 25 years work at age 55. (That one was not signed, yet).
At the city level, to pay for soaring debt and pension costs, the city just cut a deal with its largest union to pay future hires 15 percent less than those working today. Future hires will also have less vacation and sick time, and will have to pay 5.85 percent of their salaries into the pension plans (those with more than 10 years seniority pay nothing). This is about the third time past generations awarded themselves richer pensions, before sticking the next generation for the bill.
Republicans are mostly to blame for the debts, Democrats for the pensions. None of you are getting guaranteed, defined benefit pensions are you? Do you even have health insurance? You'll be paying those debts, I'll guarantee that. The only hope is that the debt and social security at the federal level will be so bad that no one will notice it's worse in New York than elsewhere.
As I said, I'm an independent candidate for New York State Assembly in Brooklyn. E-mail me and I'll tell you why. Generational equity is just one of the reasons, but it's a big one.
I was okay with the past fare (from $63 to $70) until I found out that part of the first round of war spending was a $10B payout to Israel, which was explained as shoring up its struggling economy, and I thought, hey, all this talk about not having money is a sham! They've got money, they're just giving it away to other things and then making us pay for the things we really need.