
Alexis Rockman lives in Manhattan. His painting "Manifest Destiny," depicting Brooklyn after an ecological collapse that causes extreme flooding, was one of the centerpieces of the Brooklyn Museum's recent re-opening. He is forty-one years old. We talked about scientific accuracy, planning a career in a creative discipline, and wallaby pubic hair. All of my interview questions have been removed.
I'm very interested in policing the boundaries that remind us that we are, in fact, animals, and part of whatever nature is. We are primates like other primates, and the things that I'm fascinated by are the things that remind us that we are organic, that we die, that we have sex, et cetera, that we eat, and I've been obsessed with genres that deal with those. If it's not the history of agriculture, it's hunting and fishing, domestic animals, fantasy, cryptozoology - so when I'm constructing a project, I'm trying to understand it as a historical document and use it's own strategies to undermine itself.
After all is said and done, I think that I arrive at things intuitively. I'm also very much reactive to what I've been doing, so if I've been making big paintings, I'll want to make smaller, more modest, intimate drawings afterwards just as a sense of relief from the daily grind of making something.
When I started my career, I imagined that it would be in one big book, and that was the fantasy. I wanted it to be constructed in chronological order, to be logical without being completely determinist, to be surprising without being completely insane, and have it be twists and turns about how a life perceived issues that were or have been very important, historically and internally. I see my own work in a lot of ways, from stamp collecting to trying to make a case for my own mortality, whatever. But the other thing is, I see it as a deck of cards, and you only have so many moves that you can do, and if you're constantly trying to do something in a new way, that becomes very tiring and you don't want to shoot yourself in the foot
When you're 24 years old, which I was when I had already had a two-year career being a professional artist, and you realize that you're sort of going to get what you wanted, in terms of struggling, and to be an artist, the work is obviously never over, you've never arrived because it's innately humbling and about reconsidering constantly what you're doing in order to move forward. The sense of humility is overwhelming, obviously. You want to be in a position where you give yourself opportunities to grow that won't undermine your own history. I tried to cast a very wide net and then be able to explain to myself - and I always fantasize - The fantasy is, what do you want to be thinking when you're on your deathbed? Do you want to have regrets about being chickenshit, or being lazy or being scared, or basically making work that you knew you could sell, or do you want to take the risks that are inherent with being an artist and try to juggle the pragmatic parts of being a businessperson and the intuitive, larger than life stuff that really drives us all to want to do that.
I think everything gets harder the older you get.
Right now, I'm finishing up my book about Tasmania that I'm doing with two journalists that Random House is publishing next year, and there's 50 small drawings in it that are made out of soil and bark and ferns and fur and whatever from our trip to Tasmania. You know, 30 zip-lock bags full of different stuff, from sperm whale oil to wallaby pubic hair, wombat poop, Tasmanian devil poop. So I'm doing exactly what I feel like doing, which is small things that aren't about making enormous, time-consuming statements.
I always think that if you're going to deal with genres that have to do with fantasy, you have to set a platform that has credibility, or the fantasies are going to be arbitrary. So what I try to do is set up a context for myself that has to do with a genre that I'm interested in, for instance, hunting, and then one of the things that you can do with hunting - or let's say fishing – is, how do you take a genre that is familiar, which could be, you know, "Two teenage boys in a boat catching a fish," that's the American dream. We all grew up with a collective consciousness, and unconsciousness. If we're American, we looked at National Geographic, Golden field guides, Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom, depending on how old you are, and that's a really interesting resource to mine. So one of the things you can do to that to play around with those traditions is change scale, change species, change the humans - there's any number of things you can do. So what I'm interested in is setting the table with a sense of authority, and then finding ways to call into question some of those beliefs.
- Interview by K. Thor Jensen





I DON'T LIKE THIS NEW FORMAT
READING IS HARD
MAKE READING LESS HARD PLZ
I think humans are different than other primates. One example: we can type faster.
I actually like this format for the reason stated earlier: you focus on the person being interviewed. it's not about silly transient hipster wit, but about getting a sense of someone.
krucoff's format was fine, but many of the interviewees focused on the format, i.e. they tried to be profound or ironic about the questions, but rarely would you get a sense of them as people. this format changes that.
for those having trouble reading a paragraph, go back to that copy of the post you have dangling next to your computer. maybe buy a coloring book or play around some more with that moronic bullet options on your copy of MS Word. everyone's time will be better spent that way.
Lay off, people. He's a great guy, a great writer and a great illustrator and he's doing something just a little different. If you don't like the format, wait until Monday. I'm sure everyone's angry comments will cow the next poor sod into doing something completely stale and unobjectionable.
By the way, not to pick on dave, but if the NYT book review were written in all caps it probably wouldn't be considered the critical heavyweight that it is.
And Thor, you could always email the complete interviews to your detractors to shut them up.
Cheers,
Jackson
Just to clarify, there is only one pejorative comment on this board about the current format. My comment is about Alexis Rockman's theory that "we are primates like other primates."
The current format is growing on me.
Thanks for talking about the content, Alex. Alexis is an amazing painter - for images from his Tasmania book, go here and scroll down: http://www.gblgallery.com/exhibitions/03_rockman.html - they're very different from his other work and amazingly beautiful.
Hey will,
We're all nobodies...'till someone gets to know us. ;)
A usable interview format does not equal "stale and unobjectionable".
I read this at work, where I'm usually supposed to be doing something else, so big block paragraphs of text void of context or structure are unappealing. The whole idea of blog as content management tool - be it the news or the interview - is to provide information in an easy to read and digestable format.
Why that means the content therefore becomes stale and unobjectionable is beyond me.
K. Thor,
Thanks for directing me to Rockman's site. What I find fascinating is that he uses seemingly mundane, organic materials from Tasmania to do his paintings for the Tasmania book — things like pulverized rotting (at what point does it become "rotten"?) wood, kelp, soil, fern matter (great name for a punk band), and decayed firm stem. Now that's original. Seriously, it's brilliant stuff.
You should link that site in the interview so more people can check out his work.
That should be "fern stem"...not "firm stem."
Right.
A few years back I did some freelance for Mr Rockman. I remember being amazed by his painting and really wanted to meet him in person. Then, after speaking with Mr Rockman on the phone, I realized what a fucking asshole the guy really was. I do have to admit he's got talent, but not much in terms of personality. Don't think I want to hear much about him these days. That's all
He even looks like a fucking asshole.
Don't be hatin'. He is not an asshole. He's very blunt, sometimes to a fault, but he is one of the most honest, down-to-earth, loyal people in the art world (though perhaps that's not saying much). It's also very rare to encounter an interest so committed to both important content and accessible form.
Ooops, I meant "artist," not "interest."
Thanks marisa, are you sucking his cock?
Come to think of it, he never asked me to. The man is remiss!
**2**
Hey Alexis if you need any more Wombat Poop, I might be able to help you out :D, you may contact me at http://www.wombats.info/ and we can arrange you some Wombats Droppings... hehehe your too funny man..