<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Shrek 2, Sort of Reviewed</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/24/shrek_2_sort_of_reviewed.php</link>
<description>All comments for Shrek 2, Sort of Reviewed</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Alex (formerly zander106)</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/24/shrek_2_sort_of_reviewed.php#comment-23481</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/24/shrek_2_sort_of_reviewed.php#comment-23481</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 16:12:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I see the boo birds are out for Shrek 2, so I will step up and say, &quot;Shrek 2! Good!&quot; I liked the first one, and I liked this one too. Thematically it&apos;s a retread of the same ideas as the first one -- be true to thine self, be true -- but I still found it to be an enjoyable romp.

The Shrek movies kinda remind me of Aladdin. Aladdin was a great fun Disney movie, but there were a lot of topical jokes and silliness by Robin Williams that prevent it from being a timeless, transcendent classic. I give it up for Spirited Away though, one of the most creative movies I&apos;ve ever seen, on par with Wizard of Oz (a direct influence, it appears).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Erin</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/24/shrek_2_sort_of_reviewed.php#comment-23480</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/24/shrek_2_sort_of_reviewed.php#comment-23480</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 13:31:01 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I really liked the first Shrek, but agree with you about Shrek 2. I found it lacking. Everyone I went to see it with was kind of disappointed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mase</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/24/shrek_2_sort_of_reviewed.php#comment-23479</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/24/shrek_2_sort_of_reviewed.php#comment-23479</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 11:46:28 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for admitting not loving the first &quot;Shrek.&quot;  I, also, found the first one just O.K.  When one compares it with &quot;Finding Nemo&quot;, or even &quot;Monsters, Inc&quot;, it is just not as good/fun/etc.  That said, I&apos;ll unquestionably see &quot;Shrek 2&quot; ... on DVD.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>