http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/18/blackout_baby_boom.php All comments for Blackout Baby Boom en-us 2007 nyc_daveh Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:49 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss daveh@gothamist.com daveh@gothamist.com 60 http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/18/blackout_baby_boom.php#comment-23140 http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/18/blackout_baby_boom.php#comment-23140 Comments Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:11:24 -0500 <p>Every why has a wherefore...</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/18/blackout_baby_boom.php#comment-23139 http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/18/blackout_baby_boom.php#comment-23139 Comments Tue, 18 May 2004 15:49:51 -0500 <p>plus, you don't count back 9 months, you would count back 40 weeks. pregnancy goes thru the ninth month - hence 40 weeks. i realize i may be the only mom/pregnant woman reading this but it is worth noting.</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/18/blackout_baby_boom.php#comment-23138 http://www.gothamist.com/2004/05/18/blackout_baby_boom.php#comment-23138 Comments Tue, 18 May 2004 10:39:24 -0500 <p>Ah, but does an increased amount of getting it on really have to end up with an increased amount of babies? Maybe there was a increased amount of sex that all happened to be protected. I'm just sayin', is all.</p>