<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Holdout Granny Juror</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php</link>
<description>All comments for Holdout Granny Juror</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>ed</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19078</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19078</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 23:10:52 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Talmudic law&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>John</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19077</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19077</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:01:53 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the juror was bought. It&apos;s not like the defendants couldn&apos;t afford to toss her a few million out of the almost 700 million dollars they &quot;were entitled to&quot;. I feel bad about Martha. She lost several hundred million dollars over what, a couple hundred thousand in stock? And now she has to go to jail for lying about something that she was never even charged with.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Evan</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19076</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19076</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:11:33 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think she is a crazy old lady and if she was right in the head she wouldn&apos;t have flashed the okay sign.  On the other hand though you shouldn&apos;t be publishing her name and I think if a conviction comes now it is very likely it will be over turned later.  They need to call a misstrial and do it all over again. Sucks...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>j.</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19075</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19075</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:36:44 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The reason that this case is in state court rather than federal court is because -- from what I can see -- the charges are not securities fraud, but more along the lines of embezzlement. I don&apos;t know exactly what the counts are, though, so I can&apos;t tell for certain.

As for the holdout granny -- after reading today&apos;s article in the Times about what the issue actually is, she appears to actually be the sole sane person. Or at least the sole one who has a grasp on what mens rea actually is, and the distinction between a mistake of law and a mistake of fact. The potshots against her in the tabloids were gratutitous. Look, as much as you might want to nail these people, it appears that the prosecution did a lousy job w/r/t intent.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mase</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19074</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19074</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:48:22 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;my guess.  The US Atty&apos;s declined prosecution.  Just a guess though.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sterling</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19073</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19073</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:57:28 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You are correct - I just looked it up.  What the hell is the Manhattan DA doing prosecuting this?  And Morgy must be getting senile.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mase</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19072</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19072</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:36:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;ugh.  typo.  should read &quot;ummm, the trial IS a New York D.A. prosecution.&quot; sorry.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mase</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19071</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19071</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:35:11 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Sterling, ummm, isn&apos;t the trial IS a New York D.A. prosecution.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kojak</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19070</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19070</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:12:38 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Life has taught me old people are extremely stubborn and cannot be swayed once they have made a decision they believe in. The only thing to can do now is dismiss her from the jury for being unyielding and pigheaded, or declare a mistrial immediately.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sterling</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19069</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/28/holdout_granny_juror.php#comment-19069</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:16:56 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Why did the prosecution let this old crank on the jury?  If she&apos;s so incredibly obstinate, as the Post suggests, it&apos;s hard to believe she could pass for a well-socialized person.

BTW, this would never have happened if Tyco was a Manhattan DA prosecution - Morgy would have spotted her coming a mile away.  The Colony Club refused membership to his mother - caused a big row in the day, and Eleanor Roosevelt quit in protest.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>