<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Subway Photograph Reset</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php</link>
<description>All comments for Subway Photograph Reset</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 arts_jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:33:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jencarlson@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jencarlson@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Matt Caldecutt</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17830</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17830</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 08:06:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I wasn&apos;t trying to sound like I was bragging.  The &quot;(and I should know)&quot; was really a joke about Bruce Davidson can go for hours about his photos.

Laura Holder&apos;s photos so could be the next &quot;Subway&quot; series.  No one thought that Bruce Davidson&apos;s work would take off like it did.  This was something that no one had tried.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Charlie</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17829</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17829</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:20:45 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Are you kidding me!

&quot;Gothamist thinks this is what will happen with Laura Holder&apos;s photographs in 20 years.&quot;

Are you kidding - please say you&apos;re joking. Davidson works so hard to get those shots. Comparing Laura Holder to him is RIDICULOUS. No offense to Laura -keep working. Maybe the point you were trying to make was that if Laura Holder kept taking photos for 20 years straight one of her shots might resemble Davidson&apos;s.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jake</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17828</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17828</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:09:38 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i think what matt meant was that he spoke to davidson about it directly when he worked on the show.  of course, 20 years later, it&apos;s pretty hard to know what was going on in that picture.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>lorna</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17827</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17827</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:30:08 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I have been inspired by Laura Holder.  But I am always afraid that someone might attack me when I take their picture.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Matthew Caldecutt</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17826</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17826</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Bruce Davidson said it&apos;s real.  According to him (and I should know), that&apos;s an actual undercover cop with his gun to the head of a suspected robber.  Bruce had gone along with the police after he had been mugged in the subway.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Hawthorne</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17825</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17825</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 16:02:51 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That really is Biz Markie jacking another fool.  Damn I miss the graffiti.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jake</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17824</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17824</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:46:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;yeah- that can&apos;t be real.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jack</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17823</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17823</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 14:26:54 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The article is interesting and I like Bure Davidson&apos;s work, but a few of the shots in his Subway series seem staged.

Specifically, the one that you can see when you click on my name above.  It&apos;s the one with someone pointing a gun at another rider&apos;s head (NYC6004 / DAB1980012 K040).

No doubt there was crime back-in-the-day, but that photo--and a few others--look too staged to be believed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>tien</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17822</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/08/subway_photograph_reset.php#comment-17822</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 14:19:05 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;aside from the story itself, i find it striking to look at the buildings in the background and see how little they have changed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>