Quantcast

Martha Stewart's Entertaining...A Guilty Verdict

2004_03_marthacovers.jpg

Martha, Martha, Martha! The Daily News wins the battle of Martha Stewart cover headlines: Their's is "Curtains" vs. the Post's "Guilty" although the Post's layout is much cleaner, and thus, impactful. The jurors were turned off by her arrogance in thinking she could act on a stock tip, but were also possibly affected by the fact she didn't take the stand. The Times has an analysis of the outcome.

People wonder if it's a sexist world that causes Martha, who ambition was expressed in bettering a home life, while someone asserting their alpha, greedy nature, like The Donald, can be beloved. But do we love the Post on Douglas Faneuil's part in the case: "He 'Doug' Her Grave" - anytime we get to read Faneuil's email saying, "Baby put Ms. Martha in her place!" is a good time.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • "impactful"?



    [shakes head, tuts]

  • Kojak

    Her case is nothing compared to the Corruption at the Highest Levels of Business. Shes a Small Fry.

    She didnt even get charged for the insider trading, she got charged for lying to the Feds about it. (please correct me if i'm wrong)



    Even the Jurors felt sorry for her. Personally I don't. Do the crime, do the time.

  • ... and that's a good thing.

  • pjh

    martha peddled horseshit illusory living that turned everyone into fuzzy pastel wearing neat freaks...ill forgive that but unadulterated greed is inexcusable...good riddance...

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com