<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Go Go Gadget Weblog</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php</link>
<description>All comments for Go Go Gadget Weblog</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 arts_jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:33:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jencarlson@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jencarlson@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Jason McCabe Calacanis</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php#comment-17542</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php#comment-17542</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 14:35:07 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Denton will be just fine. He will have plenty of fresh bloggers to man his empire. At some point some of them will want to do their own thing, or partner with someone like WIN (the Weblogs, Inc. Network). The space is becoming sustainable--and that&apos;s a good thing!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>annfan</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php#comment-17541</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php#comment-17541</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 14:12:53 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;denton&apos;s empire crumbling?
get a clue bud, the snarky commentary editorialesque doesn&apos;t work for every genre. gizmodo since pete left = blah - i want gadgets without the snark - i&apos;m following endgadget&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jason McCabe Calacanis</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php#comment-17540</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php#comment-17540</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 12:09:08 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;ROTFL --- classic. This is like a bad 70s sitcom.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>br</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php#comment-17539</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php#comment-17539</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 09:47:24 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The real story is Nick has a Steinbrenner-level hygiene fixation and Peter would not get rid of those damn sideburns.  However, he should feel at home with Jason as we all know how unkempt he is.  I have never before heard a venture capitalist make regular showers a deal breaker.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jake</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php#comment-17538</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/03/04/go_go_gadget_weblog.php#comment-17538</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 02:39:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;that photo montage is the single greatest piece of art to ever appear on gothamist.  bravo!

also, to throw my two cents in, i think pete rojas is an extremely attractive fellow- much more so than that lout jim carrey.  and yet, i don&apos;t see jeff&apos;s point.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>