http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/13/loving_so_much.php All comments for Loving So Much en-us 2007 jen Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss jen@gothamist.com jen@gothamist.com 60 http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/13/loving_so_much.php#comment-16365 http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/13/loving_so_much.php#comment-16365 Comments Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:57:28 -0500 <p>Wait wait wait... I don't know what a zipless fuck is. Do I have to read that book to find out? I have more than enough properly characterized canonical lit in my properly syllabized comp. lit. classes to go reading yet another poppéd person who pretends rebellion via "candor" and "sad-happiness."</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/13/loving_so_much.php#comment-16364 http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/13/loving_so_much.php#comment-16364 Comments Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:27:17 -0500 <p>loved Bertolucci, HATED THE DREAMERS. From the get-go, it was the most self-satisfied, self-important piece of self-indulgence I've ever seen. It made me want to slap silly every '68 cinematheque-rioting, baby booming philosophe who crosses my path. How Bertolucci could turn this dewy-eyed filmmaker against an important movement in world history, I just don't know. Lots of young tail, though, doing stuff that'd make Kubrick blush.</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/13/loving_so_much.php#comment-16363 http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/13/loving_so_much.php#comment-16363 Comments Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:49:55 -0500 <p>Total Stan and Wendy. Nice call, Adam.</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/13/loving_so_much.php#comment-16362 http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/13/loving_so_much.php#comment-16362 Comments Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:38:35 -0500 <p>Ah, love. Bertolucci and Godard, Stan and Wendy.</p>