<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Death&apos;s Decline in New York City</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/03/deaths_decline_in_new_york_city.php</link>
<description>All comments for Death&apos;s Decline in New York City</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Cheng</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/03/deaths_decline_in_new_york_city.php#comment-15878</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/03/deaths_decline_in_new_york_city.php#comment-15878</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:39:18 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Re: 3 WTC 9/11 deaths outside of New York

You mean the Table WTC2 figure of Deaths by Date of Death?  Since these happened days or weeks after the attack, I assume they&apos;re severely injured people who were taken home by out-of-state families, and who later died of their injuries.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jenny</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/03/deaths_decline_in_new_york_city.php#comment-15877</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/03/deaths_decline_in_new_york_city.php#comment-15877</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 16:14:51 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The trade center stuff was pretty interesting. they actually had a birth chart that shows the 8-9 months after the attack [ya know, the so-called baby boom that was supposed to show up?] weird though. there are three deaths outside of NY that are considered part of the 9/11 deaths. One of those is in Missouri. Any idea why this is?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sterling</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/03/deaths_decline_in_new_york_city.php#comment-15876</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/03/deaths_decline_in_new_york_city.php#comment-15876</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 14:58:44 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That&apos;s a terrific chart - somebody in city gov&apos;t deserves some serious kudos for putting it in that context.  What I&apos;d like to see next: the deathrate from alcohol and drugs for the whole tenure of New York.  My guess - it hasn&apos;t fallen so low as that from contagion.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>tien</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/03/deaths_decline_in_new_york_city.php#comment-15875</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2004/02/03/deaths_decline_in_new_york_city.php#comment-15875</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 14:54:14 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;well, the diabetes thing is related to the higher incidences of diabetes in african americans are higher than that of most other groups in the country.  genetics play a role, and i&apos;m sure SES only compounds the problems.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>