<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Cushman&apos;s New York Photos</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php</link>
<description>All comments for Cushman&apos;s New York Photos</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>rocky hanrahan</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-1006373</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-1006373</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:19:48 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I have been on this site for several years now and and it has changed my life for ever. they are fascinating! especially the boston photos! thank you mr. cushman!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jimmy Legs</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14119</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14119</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 14:55:10 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;those photos are amazing. i never see photos from that era that are actually in color.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>990000</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14118</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14118</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2004 16:48:51 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;wow&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jim</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14117</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14117</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2004 10:14:50 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this great window onto the past!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jen</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14116</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14116</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:32:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What is amazing is that these photographs were in storage from 1972 (when Cushman bequeathed them) till 1999 (when a university archivist found them).  Apparently the slides were in suitcases, neatly labeled.  It&apos;s so great that Indiana University has put it online for everyone to enjoy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>aron</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14115</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14115</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:50:17 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;wow&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tamara</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14114</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14114</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:24:30 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;WOW, the wonderful thing about the pics is the quality...heck, some could be digital photos with that kind of quality. Happy New Year!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>joe s</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14113</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14113</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:50:31 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Very nice.  The original photoblogger?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>rion</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14112</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14112</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:32:02 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;phenom find, jake. 

but with continued nyc archiving to do, i think this find means that new year&apos;s resolution &quot;less &apos;blog&apos;&quot; is not the way to go in 2004. ;-)

happy new year!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>karatechimp</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14111</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14111</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:56:06 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I like the hotdog vendor shot. Good color.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>eli</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14110</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14110</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:51:57 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I like how even the bums are wearing suits (sans ties only) and hats.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>hatchback</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14109</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/12/31/cushmans_new_york_photos.php#comment-14109</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:33:36 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Those photos are amazing, Jake. And what sets them apart from historic New York photos you often see is that they&apos;re in color. That goes a long way toward cutting through that whole nostalgic/old-timey haze that can come between viewer and the photo&apos;s subject.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>