
The NY Post reports that Daniel Libeskind's "win" to design the WTC site came as a result of a name–calling contest, architecture–style. And partly because of the Post. One of Libeskind's partners, Gary Hack, said that when the two final WTC redesign plans were announced, the Post and other papers referred to the Libeskind design as "The Pit." So Libeskind and and his crew referred to rival THINK plan as "The Skeleton," which Hack later credits with leading Governor Pataki to say, re: the THINK design, "There's no goddamn way I'm going to build those skeletons." Note to all: Architects may wear funky glasses, but they are fierce, yo, so watch yo' back.




Since when are Siegfried & Roy redesigning the WTC site?
a suggested read...
http://www.archpaper.com/news/ground_zero.html
Hack's trying to disown his comments, but this jibes with Rafael Vinoly's own account of the naming battle and politicking that led up to Libeskind's selection.
Here's a June post with excerpts
http://greg.org/2003_06_01_archive.html#rvinoly
Here's a full account of Vinoly's side of the story as told at MIT last May.
http://mitworld.mit.edu/video/121/