In the ongoing effort to overhaul the city's schools, Schools Chancellor Joel Klein is introducing a new way to evaluate the education their students are getting:
Rate the teachers. The progress of students will be compared to students at similar levels across schools over three years; factors like poverty and special–needs students will be considered. Klein is trying to introduce accountability to the system, but may face some contention from the teachers' union. This sounds intriguing but seems ripe with some stumbling blocks (teachers are accountable to a degree, but what about the students' home life). Additionally,
most NYers find the city school system lacking, though there is some hope in what the Bloomberg administration is doing to turn things around.
New York had teacher accountability report cards a century ago. It's funny how educational reform moves in cycles like that. (Does anyone else think it's weird that educational researchers refer to students as "cohorts"? It sounds so... sinister!)
the flip side of that proposal "accounting for special needs and poverty" would be in effect that the teachers are less "accountable" to poor kids. On the one hand, poverty has associated with it a whole host of factors that are barriers to education, but saying, "we don't expect as much of you if the children in your class are poor," is a little much. We *should* find a way to say, "we expect more from you if the kids in your class are poor."
How come all these other countries can do it better for less (and still pay their teachers well?)
I don't think anything will improve the results except more hours with books. And that costs zip extra.