<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: City Says No To Non-Partisan Elections</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/11/05/city_says_no_to_nonpartisan_elections.php</link>
<description>All comments for City Says No To Non-Partisan Elections</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Hoofin</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/11/05/city_says_no_to_nonpartisan_elections.php#comment-11516</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/11/05/city_says_no_to_nonpartisan_elections.php#comment-11516</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 03:38:41 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Bridgewater Township, New Jersey had nonpartisan elections under the state&apos;s Faulkner Act, from 1975 to 1983.  The county Republicans didn&apos;t like them because they diluted voting strength for the G.O.P. (they lost a freeholder seat), so the word was put out to eliminate them.

Newark and Jersey City are nonpartisan elections, but only Democrats run in them.

I believe every local office in Massachusetts is nonpartisan by law.

Just some interesting facts if the issue ever comes up at a party or other get-together (political science club?)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>