<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Editable Blogs</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php</link>
<description>All comments for Editable Blogs</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Ken Sands</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php#comment-9576</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php#comment-9576</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:45:16 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;To clarify: It&apos;s not precise to state that there is no editing of blogs at The Spokesman-Review. It is true that the blogs are not edited before they are posted by their authors on our Web site. But the blogs are monitored -- and lightly edited -- by a staff of four Web editors who check on the blogs daily.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jen</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php#comment-9575</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php#comment-9575</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:30:06 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Aw, thanks.  My mind is at ease!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php#comment-9574</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php#comment-9574</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:28:27 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Gothamist: I&apos;m sure you&apos;ve already seen this little tidbit going around but thought it might ease your mind regarding your typos, if not your logic mistakes (which I&apos;ve never noticed anyway):

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn&apos;t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you
can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by itslef but the wrod as a wlohe and the biran fguiers it out aynawy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sterling</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php#comment-9573</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php#comment-9573</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:36:54 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Whoops.  Wrong post.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sterling</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php#comment-9572</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/09/29/editable_blogs.php#comment-9572</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:36:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, yes - it&apos;s OK to blacklist Kazan for being a conscientious patriot, but wrong to blacklist real Hollywood communists who were trying to use their influence to undermine the United States Government.  

Proven facts: There was a Communist Party of the United States.  It received funds and direction from Moscow.  Its affiliate in Los Angeles was directly involved in exerting influence over the film industry, working to embed pro-communist, anti-capitaliist propaganda in American films, for the purpose of eventually affecting a violent overthrow of the United States Government.  

As hard as it may be for vivacious, well-paid young 21st century yuppies to believe, there was a good 30 or 35 year stretch following World War II during which world communism was on the march, and capitalism in retreat.  We very nearly lost the Cold War.  The battle against Hollywood communists was a front in that war, and Elia Kazan fought on YOUR side.  He should have gotten a medal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>