I just don;t understand, why the show's producers are showing us 4 desperate, pathetic women, and ask us the audience to... think what of them?

Not one of them is pretty, not one of them is intelligent. Especially Sarah Jessica Parker. Let me count the ways in which se is not pretty at all.

First hair: Awful hair, walking around unkempt, dark roots.

Then features: she looks like a horse.

Lips: are patheltic. The scene in which the artist guy leaves her alone in a Paris museum, and then she's breaking up with him, her lips are so pathetic.

Arms are awful. Has muscles, but no good fat. Horrible, horrible arms.

Hands: Can't even begin..they are so not pretty.

Tits are saggy.

All of them have awful feet.

There are constant references to how engaging, smart and funny she is, but there are instances to illustrate these qualities. It seems that Big should like her, not the 26-year-old stick with no soul.

Well, the stick is young, pretty, rich, has got better hair, arms, hands, tits. And does not seem as desperate as Sarah Jessica. I can go on and on.

does anyone watch this show just for the sex? And the shoes of course, not the powering women bullshit of being single for so long.

yeah- before sex in the city, when i walked into a bar and ordered a cosmo, most of the people there would just assume i was gay. now they assume i'm sarah jessica parker, which works much more to my advantage.

Eh, speak for yourself. As horrible at the situations get, as trashy as the clothes are, there are kernels of truth to what the ladies chat about. Plus, it's made the Cosmo more ubiquitous, and Jake, for one, is grateful for that.

I can't wait until that show is off the air.

Why don't they just call it.

Horny Rich Middle Age Women in the City