Quantcast

Ambition to Burn: Jayson Blair at The New York Times

Jayson Blair
The unraveling of Jayson Blair's news career has been interesting and shocking to media watchers and embarrassing to his employer, The New York Times. Blair, who repeated fabricated elements of his stories, resigned last week under pressure, after it soon became clear he did not truly report on the stories he was covering. And the Times, in an incredibly detailed investigation and mea culpa, writes about Blair's career, from intern to national reporter, checkered with various incidents that should have been red flags a long the way, as well as how it has damaged the newspaper itself. It describes Blair's work as that "of a troubled young man veering toward professional self-destruction."

Noting two turning points, the Maryland sniper coverage and the recent war coverage, the Times was faced with a number of conflicting reports about Blair's accuracy and integrity when reporting. After a thorough investigation, they realized he had been falsifying and plagiarizing his work. Things like Blair's laptop and cellphone enabled him to pretend to be at a story's location, like Virginia or Texas, when he'd really be in New York. Some editors were wary of his reporting skills, including Jonathan Landman who emailed newsroom administrators with "We have to stop Jayson from writing for the Times. Right now." in 2002.

Gothamist is fascinated by the story because it involves so many different elements: Ideas about youth and race and ambition, coupled with the seductive deception that technology can encourage, under the guise of one of the most important newspapers in the country. After reading the article, Gothamist was stunned, by both the level of investigation and honesty (but there was really no other way the Times could go, aside from emphasizing Blair is, hopefully, an isolated occurrence, not representative of its 375 reporters) in the piece and the scope of Blair's "double life" - that as seemingly reliable reporter when really someone who took the work of others while not seeming to do much of his own original work.

The Times' editors' note, apologizing for the lapse in journalistic standards. A list of Blair's articles and errors.

Seth Mnookin interviews Stephen Glass in Newsweek, whom Mnookin calls "founding member" of the media "liar's club." Glass fabricated an unseemly amount of stories at the New Republic.

Updated, May 21, 2003: All of Gothamist's coverage on Jayson Blair, including today's Observer pieces.

Gothamist excerpts a few interesting parts of the Times article on Blair's reporting history:

Example of Blair at work:
- A freelance photographer whom Mr. Blair had arranged to meet outside the Cleveland church on April 6 found it maddening that he could not seem to connect with him. The photographer, Haraz Ghanbari, was so intent on a meeting that he placed nine calls to Mr. Blair's cellphone from 9:32 a.m. to 2:07 p.m., and kept trying six more times until 10:13 p.m., when he finally gave up.

Mr. Ghanbari said he managed to reach Mr. Blair three times, and three times Mr. Blair had excuses for why they could not meet. In one instance, Mr. Ghanbari said, Mr. Blair explained that he had left the church in the middle of the service "to get his cellphone fixed" — that was why so many of his calls had gone unanswered — "and was already on his way back."

"I just thought it was weird how he never showed up," Mr. Ghanbari said.

The article that Mr. Blair eventually filed incorporated at least a half-dozen passages lifted nearly verbatim from other news sources, including four from The Washington Post.

Day to day deception:
- In e-mail messages to colleagues, for example, he conveyed the impression of a travel-weary national correspondent who spent far too much time in La Guardia Airport terminals. Conversely, colleagues marveled at his productivity, at his seemingly indefatigable constitution. "Man, you really get around," one fellow reporter wrote Mr. Blair in an e-mail message.

Blair's early days at the Times:
- At summer's end, The Times offered Mr. Blair an extended internship, but he had more college course work to do before his scheduled graduation in December 1998. When he returned to the Times newsroom in June 1999, Ms. Rule said, everyone assumed he had graduated. He had not; college officials say he has more than a year of course work to complete.
- Charles Strum, his editor at the time, encouraged Mr. Blair to pace himself and take time off. "I told him that he needed to find a different way to nourish himself than drinking scotch, smoking cigarettes and buying Cheez Doodles from the vending machines," Mr. Strum said.

Expenses:
-On an expense report filed in January, for example, he indicated that he had bought blankets at a Marshalls department store in Washington; the receipt showed that the purchase was made at a Marshalls in Brooklyn. He also reported a purchase at a Starbucks in Washington; again, the receipt showed that it was in Brooklyn. On both days, he was supposedly writing articles from the Washington area.
Mr. Blair also reported that he dined with a law enforcement official at a Tutta Pasta restaurant in Washington on the day he wrote an article from there. As the receipt makes clear, this Tutta Pasta is in Brooklyn. Mr. Blair said he dined with the same official at Penang, another New York City restaurant that Mr. Blair placed in Washington on his expense reports.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Jen

    I happen to second that sentiment and that's why I removed the word. It's one thing to base your hate for someone due to the person's total stupidity. It's another to fall back on race.

  • SUSAN B.

    Oops, I see the change. In that case, PLEASE remove my posts. (the other was posted by my brother bob)

  • SUSAN B.

    If you "don't" delete it, does that mean you'll leave "anything" offensive we say up here? Do you think saying following is offensive enough to women to be removed: CUNT BITCH, FUCKING DIKE BITCH, FUCKING FAGGOT so on and so forth. As a black woman, the word nigger is just as offensive to me as those anti-women/anti-gay epithets. I think you should remember that freedom of speech doesn't mean people have the right to post a verbal swastika on your website. Please don't be an apologist to those who practice cultural violence in any form.

  • Bob

    I don't think deleting the word NIGGER is censorship, no more than I think certain other high profile blogs would think twice about deleting the word KIKE, SPIC, JAP, or CHINK. I wouldn't mind seeing the word nigger deleted, I don't think you will get beat up for removing that very offensive word.

  • jake

    jesus- that last comment is so idiotic that i almost want to delete it- but censorship is not what we're about here.

  • Kane

    Recent events prove that the Blair scandal, contrary to the belief/desires of many, was in fact NOT a matter of race/affirmative action and more a matter of shoddy management on the part of Raines and Boyd.

    In case you're not up to speed, witness the latest suspension of white New York Times writer Rick Bragg (http://www.cjr.org/year/03/3/b... for Blair-like offensives. Also, it has been revealed that four other NYT non-black writers are now under investigation (http://www.nypost.com/seven/05... for possible problems with their stories.

    All that said, as a black person myself, I find it absolutely offensive that Blair has the nerve to create a book proposal which is based on playing the race card and calls the NYT racist. I'm sure he experienced 'some' racial moments there (New York City isn't the liberal mecca some believe it is), but to befoul the NYT with a such a broad brush after getting such an opportunity and then cry racism is absolutely unacceptable. I also think this outlandish claim confirms that Blair is mentally unstable and very likely prone to some sort of criminal behavior. The publisher that gives this guy a book deal should be boycotted.

    In The Observer, Blair compared himself to Stephen Glass. This is laughable. Blair's points in the interview would be totally valid if he, like Glass, actually spent some time offering contrition. But he didn't. In fact, he's laughing about his deception to the press. I think Glass is slimy too, but at least he went through the motions of "I'm sorry I did it" and he let some time pass. Blair's rush to cash in is just obscene. And to laugh in the face of those who gave you a job at the most important newspaper on the planet is just unforgivable.

  • Cori

    This article makes me sick! I went to school for journalism and I can't find a job in my field. Maybe it is because I am too honest! It drives me mad that these crooked individuals always seem to be the ones that land jobs. I am not saying that every working journalist is like this. What I am saying is that this guy is the reason that good people like myself can't get a break!

  • Quan

    So why isn't white privilege brought up when white plagiarists are caught, but every black person who may have had some help in cracking the old boy's club now suddenly suspect after Jayson Blair? Surely Shallit or Glass had a supporter or two at the New Republic. Why isn't this called affirmative action?

  • onwisc92

    not familiar with NY Penal Code but just purused the section on business frauds... i wonder if a creative DA could convince a judge/jury that blair's actions constitute a business fraud...

  • PDiddy

    Anyone know where he went to high school? He looks like a possible classmate.

  • Irene

    Did I accidentally land on metafilter?The NYTimes couldn't bring charges - the district attorney would have to bring charges against Jayson and I don't think that there are any laws applicable to the situation. There are two types of fraud: civil and criminal. I don't think that fraud of the criminal kind would apply here and that is what would be needed to trigger the Son of Sam law.

  • Nemo

    Shameless indeed. I heard Jayson is in negotiations with a publisher and may be getting a mid-six-figure book deal. Wow. If the New York Times could bring criminal charges of fraud against him and get a conviction, perhaps the Son of Sam law could prevent this. Or could it? Anybody know?

  • michael thomas

    I think this is a very bad situation, first of all, what does this say about affirmative action and diversity? just because your black or a minority that you can just fuck up and not worry about it , and what does this say about the New York Times , didn't someone even bother to check his facts and make sure that he did everythihg right , who the fuck we're his editors , maybe they should be fired too , shit rolls downhill ya know , and this is a slap in the face to everyone who has put in the hard work once they we're in that "door" because of affirmative action.

  • Jasper Summer

    I wonder if Rupert Murdock or Richard Mellon Scaif or some such rught wing nut case paid Blair to discredit the times????

  • Big

    As a fellow (black) journalist, I must say I'm a little pissed off with Jay. I work in television. It's already hard enough to walk up to people with cameras rolling and convince them we're not going to twist their words around when the piece hits air. Blatant lying certainly doesn't help our cause. I really don't think this is punishment for race; it's punishment for audacity. You're just going to "make it up" in one of the most widely-read publications in America, and not get caught? That doesn't even sound right. Thanks, Jayson, for making my job a little tougher... Clearly, you're battling demons... I'll be praying for you.

  • w.bee

    Speaking of famous plagiarists, here's a good story on Ruth Shalit. http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/archives/cover/1999/cover0409.html

  • DJ

    This is a great site!

    On the Jayson Blair fiasco, not really sure that it is a race issue ... time will tell. I totally agree with Tony's assessment. As well, the media profession is always trying to out do each other, which is probably why the times turned a blind eye to his deceit.

  • tony

    is anyone surprised by any of this? stephen ambrose ("historian", author, plagiarizer), joe biden (u.s. senator, plagiarizer), george o'leary (ex-notre dame football coach,insecure resume padder/liar), and bill clinton (liar under oath, deceiver, and impeached nailer-of-fat-interns) did as bad, if not worse, deeds. The times hung this kid out to dry. america loves to believe in the fantasy, not the reality. no one wants an honest answer that is boring. this black reporter gave editors stories with sizzle. why check facts? we are all guilty of looking the other way as people cheat on taxes, have extra-marital affairs, etc. it is called the "human condition". i live life honestly because that is what i want my kids to know and see, but i don't expect anyone else to behave that way. today's society demands and encourages unethical behavior, so whatcha gonna do? trust noone, and certainly don't believe something just 'cause you read it in the times. gimme a break.

  • Hi Jen and Jake! Just discovered your excellent blog. Great post on Jayson Blair! I'll be coming back. :D

  • John

    Look at Tonya Harding (ice skating princess); she had her bf hit her competition in the knee. So whats she doing now? Last time I heard, she was on Fox doing "celebrity boxing". Oh well, maybe in a few years fox news will do a "celebrity boxing" tournament between this Jay Blair and Janet Cooke.

    Who knows, but I actually feel kinda of sorry for the guy and for Janet Cooke; however, he should have known better.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com
Â