<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Liebeskind Design Chosen for World Trade Center site[Jake 11:40pm]: Liebeskind, Liebeskind Uber Alles!</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/02/26/liebeskind_design_chosen_for_world_trade_center_sitejake_1140pm_liebeskind_liebeskind_uber_alles.php</link>
<description>All comments for Liebeskind Design Chosen for World Trade Center site[Jake 11:40pm]: Liebeskind, Liebeskind Uber Alles!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 arts_jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:33:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jencarlson@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jencarlson@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>jake</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/02/26/liebeskind_design_chosen_for_world_trade_center_sitejake_1140pm_liebeskind_liebeskind_uber_alles.php#comment-235</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/02/26/liebeskind_design_chosen_for_world_trade_center_sitejake_1140pm_liebeskind_liebeskind_uber_alles.php#comment-235</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:35:49 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
I don&apos;t agree with Matt&apos;s analysis- although Herbert Muchamp from the NYTimes definitely would. He refused to back down from his excoriation of the Liebeskind design earlier this week, writing &quot;The Libeskind design is a dramatic piece of expressionist architecture that in its original form went far toward supplanting the need for an additional memorial to the victims of 9/11. The reduction of usable space in the &quot;bathtub&quot; to a fraction of its original size must inevitably compromise the aesthetic strength for which this plan was chosen. That design&apos;s explicit equation of aesthetic with moral and indeed spiritual value is now open to serious question. Whatever one makes of the original design&apos;s heavily loaded symbolism — to my mind the meanings became more disturbing with each viewing — the design&apos;s symbolic heart no longer exists.&quot;

For my part, I think the Liebeskind plan is a good balance between the city&apos;s need for striking new architecture downtown and the needs of the families and the country to have a national memorial at the site. I mean, what else could we do? My opinion might be based in pragmatism, but that&apos;s what urban design is all about. Word up.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Matt</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2003/02/26/liebeskind_design_chosen_for_world_trade_center_sitejake_1140pm_liebeskind_liebeskind_uber_alles.php#comment-234</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2003/02/26/liebeskind_design_chosen_for_world_trade_center_sitejake_1140pm_liebeskind_liebeskind_uber_alles.php#comment-234</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:35:13 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Liebeskind, deluded that with his signature fractured compositions he is a fountainhead of the zeitgeist and expressive of some social reality in contemporary life or the reality to come, yesterday was dealt a validating hand by the City of New York. I find it sad that &quot;we&quot; endorse a scheme that will monumentalize the events of 9/11 and preserve a memory of the dead in the image of a ruin. If this event (Liebeskind&apos;s award) expresses anything about contemporary New York citizenry, it expresses our acceptance of defeat at the hand of scoundrels, our perverted revelling in victimization and our self-depricating europhilia. Welcome to the future of NYC in which our crowning achievement is synonymous with our most disasterous moment preserved.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>